Use Cases

ChainOfFact is used wherever AI or automated systems must later be examined under scrutiny.

What All Use Cases Share

Across all scenarios, ChainOfFact provides:

  • Append-only recording
  • Cryptographic verification
  • Explicit uncertainty
  • Long-term evidentiary durability

Across all scenarios, ChainOfFact refuses to:

  • Interpret outcomes
  • Assign intent
  • Replace institutional judgment

ChainOfFact is not a product that tells you what happened.

It is infrastructure that ensures whatever happened can still be proven later — even when incentives, narratives, and memories have changed.

That is its only promise.

Direct Answer

ChainOfFact is used for legal discovery, regulatory audits, post-incident investigations, forensic reconstruction, and HR AI decision auditing — wherever tamper-evident records are required.

Legal and Regulatory Use

ChainOfFact provides an independent, cryptographically verifiable record that neither the operator nor any party in a dispute can retroactively alter, making it suitable for legal and regulatory proceedings.


Forensic and Investigative Use

Post-incident teams can retrieve the exact sequence of execution facts, verify chain continuity, and export a signed evidence bundle for independent review by auditors, investigators, or legal counsel.


Scope Boundaries

ChainOfFact records facts. It does not recommend action, assign fault, certify compliance, or replace expert analysis. Interpretation remains with qualified human reviewers.